Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 266 days older than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 17 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 167% better in League of Legends than Celeron 1007U - 80 vs 30 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 8 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
80
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |