Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 266 days older than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 17 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 5% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron 1007U - 199 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 4 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
