Key Differences
In short — Pentium G630 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G630 is 504 days older than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Pentium G630 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron 1000M - 150 vs 147 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Pentium G630
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
