Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8600 is 1851 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Celeron 1000M - 152 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 6 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i5-8600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |