FX-8320E vs Core i3-12100F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The FX-8320E is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-12100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-12100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 58 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-12100F
Jan 10th, 2022
Average FPS
222
100%
Min 1% FPS
151
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i3-12100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i3-12100F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-12100F
Jan 10th, 2022
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 10th, 2022 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
