In Battlefield 6, the FX-8120 is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-10700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $343 cheaper!
FX-8120
- Up to 90% cheaper – $38.10 vs $380.99
- Up to 90% cheaper
- Up to 86% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.62 vs $4.43/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-8120 vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
61 FPS
71%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
71%
Price, $
$38.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
10%
Value, $/FPS
$4.43/FPS
14%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8120 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8120 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8120 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
