In Battlefield 6, the FX-6350 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-9980XE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-6350
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 125 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9980XE
- Up to 39% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 39% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs Core i9-9980XE: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
61 FPS
72%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
72%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core i9-9980XE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core i9-9980XE in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
32%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9980XE
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
18-core
100%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9980XE Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $1,979.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA2066 |
125 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
