Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2185 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6350 - 186 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6350 | vs | Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
