Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3758 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 29% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-6100 - 261 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6100 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
