In Battlefield 6, the FX-4350 is much slower than the Core i9-13900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $466 cheaper!
FX-4350
- Up to 85% cheaper – $82.71 vs $549.00
- Up to 85% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.35 vs $4.15/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Battlefield 6
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 116% faster in Battlefield 6 – 132 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 116% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
61 FPS
46%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
46%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
132 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
15%
Value, $/FPS
$4.15/FPS
33%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
