The EPYC 9354 is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G6900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 9354
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G6900
- Has an integrated GPU, while the EPYC 9354 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
EPYC 9354 vs Celeron G6900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 9354
Nov 10th, 2022
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
192
99%
Min 1% FPS
127
99%
Price, €
€79.65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
EPYC 9354 vs Celeron G6900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 9354 vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 9354 vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 9354
Nov 10th, 2022
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
6%
L3 Cache
4 MB
2%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 9354 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $3,420.00 | MSRP | $52.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
| 280 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
