Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms EPYC 9174F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 44 days older than EPYC 9174F.
Advantages of EPYC 9174F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than EPYC 9174F - 155 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD EPYC 9174F - 105 vs 320 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9174F doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 9174F
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Ryzen 5 7600X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9174F | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
| AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 320 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 5 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 41.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
