The EPYC 7F52 is at least much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7F52
The Core i9-14900F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-14900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
EPYC 7F52 vs Core i9-14900F
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Average FPS
202
85%
Min 1% FPS
139
86%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
238
100%
Min 1% FPS
162
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EPYC 7F52 vs Core i9-14900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7F52 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7F52 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
14%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7F52 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $524.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
| 16 | Cores | 24 |
| 32 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
