Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms EPYC 7713 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 660 days newer than EPYC 7713.
Advantages of EPYC 7713
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 2042 than EPYC 7713 - 190 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7713 - 120 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7713 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1169
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8073 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7713 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |