The EPYC 7643 is a slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G6900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7643
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 96 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G6900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Has an integrated GPU, while the EPYC 7643 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
EPYC 7643 vs Celeron G6900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7643
Mar 15th, 2021
Average FPS
184
96%
Min 1% FPS
122
96%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€79.65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
EPYC 7643 vs Celeron G6900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7643 vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7643 vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7643
Mar 15th, 2021
Cores
48-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
4%
L3 Cache
4 MB
2%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7643 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
$4,995.00 | MSRP | $52.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
225 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
48 | Cores | 2 |
96 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |