Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms EPYC 7642 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1254 days newer than EPYC 7642.
Advantages of EPYC 7642
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 96 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than EPYC 7642 - 253 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD EPYC 7642 - 150 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7642 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€557.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €557.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 373 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7642 | vs | Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
48 | Cores | 24 |
96 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 150 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |