Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 1479 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 7% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-9590 - 278 vs 260 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 180 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of FX-9590
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7551 | vs | FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| EPYC | Collection | FX |
| Naples | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
