Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms EPYC 7313 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1029 days newer than EPYC 7313.
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 19% better in No Man's Sky than EPYC 7313 - 211 vs 177 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7313 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7313
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7313 | vs | Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 16 | Cores | 24 |
| 32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
