Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1246 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 24% better in Resident Evil 4 than EPYC 7302P - 210 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 120 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1169
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7942 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7302P | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rome | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |