Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 820 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of EPYC 7282
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Tanks than EPYC 7282 - 563 vs 508 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
563
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€378.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €378.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7282 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |