Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 260 days older than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 153 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 127 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 64 vs 16 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900KS | vs | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 16 | Threads | 64 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
