In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-9900KF is slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $302 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 22% faster in Battlefield 6 – 105 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 76% cheaper – $96.99 vs $399.00
- Up to 76% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.92 vs $4.63/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 58 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 39% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
82%
Price, $
$399
24%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
20%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
105 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
94%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
