In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-7920X is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-7920X
No clear advantages
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Up to 96% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 81 FPS
- Up to 96% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 10, 2017
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 120 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 14% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
81 FPS
51%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
51%
Price, $
$349.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
75%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
13%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
51%
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2017 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $1,199.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | AM5 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
