The Core i9-7900X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6350. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-7900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the FX-6350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Core i9-7900X vs FX-6350 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-7900X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
297
100%
Min 1% FPS
174
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-7900X vs FX-6350 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7900X vs FX-6350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7900X vs FX-6350 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7900X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
14 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
8 MB
57%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-7900X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| $9.99 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Skylake-X | Codename | Vishera |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
14 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
