Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 385 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13600K.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Starfield than Core i5-13600K - 87 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €298.50 vs €467.89
- Up to 30% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-14900KF - €3.78 vs €5.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.38/FPS
70%
Price, €
€467.89
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €467.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
79
91%
Value, €/FPS
€3.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€298.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €298.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |