Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10100 - 160 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €110.24 vs €468.37
- Up to 71% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-14900KF - €0.84 vs €2.93 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.93/FPS
29%
Price, €
€468.37
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €468.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1598 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1599 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |