Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i9-13900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 369 days newer than Core i9-13900.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900 - 137 vs 131 FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
96%
Value, €/FPS
€3.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€464.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €464.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 275 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |