Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 8 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-13100.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 8% better in Deathloop than Core i3-13100 - 204 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-13100
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €138.85 vs €557.52
- Up to 73% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-13900KS - €0.73 vs €2.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 60 vs 150 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.73/FPS
27%
Price, €
€557.52
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €557.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
189
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€138.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €138.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KS | vs | Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |