The Core i9-13900K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320E. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-13900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
Core i9-13900K vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
240
100%
Min 1% FPS
164
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900K vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900K vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900K vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| $5.89 | MSRP | $1.47 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Raptor Lake-S | Codename | Vishera |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
