Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-11900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-11900K.
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-11900K - 241 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €553.74 vs €668.47
- Up to 18% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-11900K - €2.30 vs €2.79 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
241
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€553.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €553.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Buy for €668.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900F | vs | Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |