Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14600K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-13900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14600K is 286 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-13900F.
Advantages of Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i9-13900F - 248 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €337.14 vs €553.72
- Up to 40% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-13900F - €1.36 vs €2.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €553.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
248
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€337.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €337.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900F | vs | Core i5-14600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |