The Core i9-13900 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 3750H. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 3750H
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Core i9-13900 vs Ryzen 7 3750H for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
€496.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 3750H
Jan 6th, 2019
Average FPS
177
82%
Min 1% FPS
118
84%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900 vs Ryzen 7 3750H in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900 vs Ryzen 7 3750H in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900 vs Ryzen 7 3750H in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Ryzen 7 3750H
Jan 6th, 2019
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
