In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-12900KF is much faster than the Ryzen 5 2600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 61% faster in Battlefield 6 – 119 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 61% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Apr 19, 2018
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer
Ryzen 5 2600X
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900KF vs Ryzen 5 2600X: Comparison of performance and price
![Intel Core i9 [12th Gen] i9-12900KF Hexadeca-core [16 Core] 3.20 GHz Processor - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09LMQ7XGX.jpg)
Ryzen 5 2600X
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
74 FPS
62%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
62%
Price, $
$72.54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900KF vs Ryzen 5 2600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900KF vs Ryzen 5 2600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen 5 2600X
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
16 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.25 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 2600X Apr 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 4th, 2021 | Released | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| $564.00 | MSRP | $229.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM4 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
