In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-12900F is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 7600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-12900F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Ryzen 5 7600X
- Up to 7% faster in Battlefield 6 – 124 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 months and 22 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 04, 2022
- Is 8 months and 22 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900F vs Ryzen 5 7600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
124 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900F vs Ryzen 5 7600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900F vs Ryzen 5 7600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
94%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
96%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
92%
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900F Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $494.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM5 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
