In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-12900F is quite a bit faster than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-12900F
- Up to 30% faster in Battlefield 6 – 116 vs 89 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jul 27, 2020
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900F vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900F vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900F vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
62%
L3 Cache
20 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900F Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| $494.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
