The Core i9-11900F is a faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-11800H. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-11900F
- A faster CPU for gaming
Advantages of the Core i7-11800H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-11900F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i9-11900F vs Core i7-11800H for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, €
€572
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.81/FPS
100%
Core i7-11800H
May 11th, 2021
Average FPS
196
97%
Min 1% FPS
130
97%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-11900F vs Core i7-11800H in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900F vs Core i7-11800H in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900F vs Core i7-11800H in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-11800H
May 11th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-11900F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| $422.00 | MSRP | $395.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
| 16 MB | L3 Cache | 24 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
