Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 294 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €349.00 vs €400.98
- Up to 13% better value when playing New World than Core i9-11900F - €2.59 vs €2.97 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €400.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 530 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€349
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 531 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900F | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |