The Core i9-10900K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-3330. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-10900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 77 vs 125 Watts
Core i9-10900K vs Core i5-3330 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, €
€480.74
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.47/FPS
100%
Core i5-3330
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
169
87%
Min 1% FPS
113
88%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10900K vs Core i5-3330 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900K vs Core i5-3330 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900K vs Core i5-3330 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i5-3330
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-10900K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| $547.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
