In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900 is faster than the Ryzen 5 2600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900
- Up to 24% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 11 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 19, 2018
- Is 2 years and 11 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 2600
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900 vs Ryzen 5 2600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
71 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
80%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 2600 Apr 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| $483.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
