Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i9-10885H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 663 days newer than Core i9-10885H.
Advantages of Core i9-10885H
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 45 vs 58 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i9-10885H - 93 vs 79 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Core i9-10885H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10885H | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
