Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 75 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700T.
Advantages of Core i7-9700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 5% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-9700T - 80 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-9700T - €82.15 vs €425.43
- Up to 82% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-9700T - €1.03 vs €5.60 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for €425.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7619 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
80
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7618 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700T | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |