In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-9700KF is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9700KF
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 6% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 85 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700KF vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700KF vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700KF vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$374.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
