In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-9700F is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-14600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i5-14600K
- Up to 54% faster in Battlefield 6 – 126 vs 82 FPS
- Up to 54% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700F vs Core i5-14600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
82 FPS
65%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
65%
Price, $
$249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700F vs Core i5-14600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700F vs Core i5-14600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
12 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i5-14600K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14600K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| $333.00 | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
