Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 4482 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 55 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 25% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-940XM - 138 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-940XM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Ryzen 5 7600X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-940XM | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
