Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3304 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Valorant than Core i7-840QM - 738 vs 679 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
738
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €70.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 462 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-840QM | vs | Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |