Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 4061 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-820QM - 203 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€489
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7021 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-820QM | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |