In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-7820HQ is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-7820HQ
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 80% faster in Battlefield 6 – 126 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 80% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-7820HQ vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
126 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7820HQ vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7820HQ vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7820HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7820HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $378.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
