Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3030 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €134.50 vs €494.19
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900K - €0.81 vs €2.51 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 19% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-6700 - 197 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 32 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
166
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€134.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €134.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.51/FPS
32%
Price, €
€494.19
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €494.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |