The Core i7-620M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-6400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-6400
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-620M vs Core i5-6400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
187
94%
Min 1% FPS
132
95%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
200
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-620M vs Core i5-6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i5-6400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i5-6400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
99%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
50%
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
99%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-6400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| $3.32 | MSRP | $1.82 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
