In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-5930K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $361 cheaper!
Core i7-5930K
- Up to 68% cheaper – $169.00 vs $529.95
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 44% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.34 vs $4.17/FPS
- Up to 44% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 76% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 76% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-5930K vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
72 FPS
57%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
57%
Price, $
$169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.34/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
31%
Value, $/FPS
$4.17/FPS
56%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5930K vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5930K vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
15 MB
42%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5930K Sep 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
